What Are the Common Solar Panel Sizes?
November 13, 2024
Installing a solar panel system can be a steep investment. On average, an American homeowner can expect to pay $5,000-$20,000 for a complete solar panel installation. While government and state incentive programs can help offset this high price, homeowners should still expect to shell out a hefty sum for lower electricity bills. Thankfully, plenty of options allow for a more affordable entry into solar.
From the more economical polycrystalline panels to the high-end, sleek, dark-colored monocrystalline cells, there is a solar panel option for every price range imaginable. With that in mind, we created this comprehensive guide to the different solar panels to help you find the best ones for your home and budget.
4.3
No payments needed for 18 months
Provides in-house financing
Offers top brands like LG and Trina
3.9
Highly rated customer service
Provides 24/7 panel monitoring
Solid A+ rating with the BBB
3.7
Affordable prices
Excellent selection of panels and services
Locations in 22 states
Solar panels are devices designed to collect solar energy and convert it into usable electricity. The standard solar panel sandwiches two semiconductive materials, typically silicon, between a housing, such as metal or glass. As light rays, or photons, pass through the semiconductive material, they knock electrons free from the atoms, generating a small electrical current. This current is then captured and sent to your home, used as power, or sent to a solar battery and stored for later use.
This process of knocking electrons free to generate a current is called the photovoltaic effect. It was first observed in 1839 by a French scientist named Edmond Becquerel. Later in 1883, another scientist named Charles Fritts developed the first solar cell. Afterward, scientists from Russia to America began experimenting with solar-capturing technology. Modern solar panels date back to the 1950s when the scientists at Bell Labs discovered that silicon was a much more efficient semiconductor than selenium, the most common material used in solar panels until that point. Since then, solar panels have seen continuous improvement, with skyrocketing innovation.
Solar panel technology has evolved to the point where it’s accessible to many Americans, as up until the mid-2010s, it was too expensive. In fact, today, a large variety of more affordable panel options exist. Each panel type has advantages, disadvantages, costs, and requirements you should consider before choosing.
Monocrystalline solar cells (also called modules) are the cream of the crop in solar technology. They’re composed of a single sheet of monocrystalline silicon crystal and formed through an expensive manufacturing process called the Czochralski process (invented in 1916 by Jan Czochralski). These panels are forged from a single ingot of pure silicon cut and crafted in 32 to 96 silicon wafers. These wafers are then assembled into panels. Since these cells are cut from a single crystal, a large amount of silicon is lost (up to 50% in some cases), making the process inefficient and costly.
These crystalline panels are dark black, have higher efficiency, and higher wattage, last longer, and are the most expensive on the market. These panels capture about 19% to 20% of incoming photons, making them one of the most efficient options. There are different types of monocrystalline panels to choose from, such as Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell Panels (PERC panels) and Bifacial Panels.
Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell Panels are a general improvement on the monocrystalline panel technology. They add an additional layer of reflective material to the back of the panel, allowing the silicon to capture more photons while having several smaller benefits, like reducing electron recombination and heat. PERC cells are slightly more efficient and last longer than standard panels, absorbing 21% to 23% of incoming photons.
Heterojunction cells combine two solar panel technologies to increase efficiency. These solar panels work by adding a layer of amorphous silicon that absorbs more wavelengths and works together with the crystalline silicon to increase efficiency. These cells must be specially made by adapting current solar cells with amorphous silicon, making them extremely expensive. However, the extra cost comes with a significant efficiency boost, as they absorb between 23% to 26% of incoming photons.
These panels are an interesting case as they’re more efficient than standard monocrystalline panels but require a little more work. Bifacial panels function, as their name suggests, by having two solar-absorbing faces. The second face is positioned on the back of the panel, which absorbs reflected light that would otherwise be wasted. Unfortunately, these are useless when installed flat on any surface, like on a roof. The only way for a homeowner to take advantage of these types of panels is to have a section of their property that is cordoned off and have these panels installed on the ground. If homeowners are able to make these panels work, it’s typically worth it, as these panels have been known to have an efficiency as high as 27%. While the most efficient bifacial panels are of a monocrystalline type, polycrystalline bifacial panels also exist but are less common.
A more economical way to harness solar power is with polycrystalline solar cells, also called “multi-crystalline” panels. Unlike monocrystalline, these solar cells are composed of multiple shards of silicon fragments, which are melted down and poured into small square wafer molds. These wafers are combined into square panels with a dark blue, speckled color.
Little silicon is wasted in the process, and these panels are much easier and cheaper to make, resulting in a far lower price tag. However, these silicon solar cells don’t last as long and have a lower heat tolerance, making them unsuitable for extremely hot climates. They also have a lower efficiency rating, only drawing in between 13% and 17% of photons that pass through them.
“Thin-film solar cells” is an umbrella term that describes several types of solar panels. These panels are typically thin, malleable, inexpensive, and used in industrial or commercial applications. While less common, some homes also use thin-film solar panels, but only if the roof is of a bizarre shape or is old and cannot support the weight of standard panels. Thin-film solar panels also have a low energy efficiency rating, ranging from 7% to 18%, depending on the specific kind of panel and its materials.
Cadmium telluride is the most common thin-film panel on the market, making up 5% of solar panel sales. These panels can reach an efficiency rating comparable to polycrystalline panels, ranging from 9% to 15%. They are composed of cheaper materials such as cadmium telluride, cadmium sulfide, or magnesium sulfide. Unfortunately, these low-cost materials are also toxic pollutants that, if improperly disposed of, can be dangerous to the environment and human health.
Amorphous silicon panels use similar technology as standard silicon panels but with a malleable twist. Instead of crystalline silicon wafers, these panels use a thin strip of silicon with a texture similar to rubber. These panels are extremely lightweight, versatile, non-toxic, and cheap but are low-efficiency. These panels have an efficiency rating of about 7%, making them a poor choice for homes. However, they still find a widespread application in commercial projects and objects with low power requirements, like solar-powered calculators and rovers.
These are the most efficient thin-film panels on the market. They’re composed of copper, gallium, indium, and selenide placed on top of a base of steel, glass, plastic, or other, more rigid materials. While not as malleable as amorphous silicon, these panels are still bendable and can fit into locations standard panels cannot, making them a popular choice for homes with odd-shaped roofs. These are the types of solar cells present in solar shingles and similar rooftop solar technology. They also have a high enough efficiency rating to warrant residential use, seeing common ranges of 12% to 15% but hitting numbers as high as 20% in lab conditions.
When people rate and compare solar panels online, the term “efficiency” comes up a lot. Solar panel efficiency describes the amount of light, specifically photons, that the solar panels convert into usable electricity. If a solar panel has an efficiency of 20% (as most modern solar panels do), it will convert 20% of the light that makes contact with it to power for your home to use.
When comparing the pure efficiency of solar panels, monocrystalline typically comes out on top, especially when you get into the more high-end variants. But, the higher cost is typically not worth the few percentage points of increased efficiency for most homeowners. Generally, most American households can get by on panels with an efficiency of around 20%. Areas with fewer sun hours, or a long winter, may want to aim for high-efficiency panels rated at or above 20% or purchase lower-efficiency panels to compensate.
Here is a quick overview of all the efficiency levels of solar panels.
Panel Type | Efficiency Range |
Monocrystalline Panels | 15%-24% |
Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell Panels | 21%-23% |
Heterojunction Cell Panels | 23%-26+% |
Bifacial Panels | Up to 27% |
Polycrystalline Panels | 13%-17% |
Thin-film Panels | 7%-18% |
Cadmium Telluride Panels | 9%-15% |
Amorphous Silicon Panels | 7% |
Copper Indium Gallium Selenide Panels | 12%-15% |
For the last decade, solar panels have been steadily lowering in price as technology advances, and panels become easier to produce. However, many types of solar panels and brands still carry a hefty price tag. Thankfully, there are federal and state incentive programs to help offset the high up-front cost.
Solar panels are priced by the total watt capacity of each panel, and your solar photovoltaic (PV) system’s total cost will equal the combined cost of each panel in watts plus installation fees. These prices vary wildly depending on the solar company you choose to work with and your state. The following table provides the average national cost of solar panels by watt, the total cost of solar panels (materials only), and then the total installation cost of the solar power system. We always recommend scheduling an appointment with a solar industry professional and receiving a quote. While this data can help you estimate the costs, a professional quote will provide:
Panel Type | Cost Per Watt | Estimated Cost of Panels | Estimated Installation Cost |
Monocrystalline Panels | $1.00 to $1.50 | $6,000 to $9,000 | $18,000 to $27,000 |
Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell Panels | $.32 to $.65 | $2,100 to $3,500 | $6,300 to $10,500 |
Heterojunction Cell Panels | $1.30 to $1.50 | $7,800 to $9,000 | $23,000 to $27,000 |
Bifacial Panels | Up to an additional 10 to 20 cents per watt | Varies based on baseline panel | Varies based on baseline panel |
Polycrystalline Panels | $.90 to $1.00 | $5,400 to $6,000 | $16,200 to $18,000 |
Thin-film Panels | $0.70 to $1.00 | $4,200 to $6,000 | $12,900 to $18,000 |
Cadmium Telluride Panels | $.50 to $.60 | $2,500 to $3,000 | $7,000 to $9,000 |
Amorphous Silicon Panels | $.43 to $.50 | $2,300 to $2,500 | $3,500 to $7,000 |
Copper Indium Gallium Selenide Panels | $.60 to $.70 | $3,000 to $4,000 | $9,000 to $12,000 |
Alongside efficiency, solar panel capacity, also called power capacity, is a key factor in a solar panel’s ability to output electricity. A solar panel’s capacity is the total amount of power it can produce, measured in watts. The higher a solar panel’s capacity, the more electricity it can generate in ideal conditions. Here is a quick rundown of the capacity levels of each type of solar panel:
Panel Type | Capacity in Watts (Assuming the Panel is 60 Cells) |
Monocrystalline Panels | 310 to 350 |
Bifacial Panels | Add 10% to 20% to the wattage on any solar panel with bifacial panel |
Polycrystalline Panels | 250 to 300 watts |
Thin-film Panels | 250 to 400 watts |
Cadmium Telluride Panels | 110 to 400 watts |
Amorphous Silicon Panels | 45 to 60 watts per 2.5 by 5-foot strip |
Copper Indium Gallium Selenide Panels | 250 to 350 watts |
The final factor you should consider when purchasing a solar power system is its expected life span. While most solar panels will last well over two decades — or even three — not all are so durable. Here is how long you can expect your solar panels to last under ideal operating conditions:
Panel Type | Life Expectancy Given Ideal Conditions |
Monocrystalline Panels | 25 to 40 years |
Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell Panels | 25 to 30 years |
Heterojunction Cell Panels | 30 to 40 years |
Bifacial Panels | Variable, but typically 25 to 40 years |
Polycrystalline Panels | 25 to 35 years |
Thin-film Panels | 10 to 20 years |
Cadmium Telluride Panels | 25 to 30 years |
Amorphous Silicon Panels | Up to 10 years |
Copper Indium Gallium Selenide Panels | 20 to 30 years |
Remember that environmental factors like strong winds, hail, sleet, and high temperatures can shorten the life span of or damage solar panels.
Solar energy is a sustainable, eco-friendly alternative to power derived from fossil fuels. Over the last decade, it has become increasingly available to American households, seeing meteoric rises in popularity in the late 2010s. Unfortunately, the steep barrier to entry into solar can be a tough hurdle for many. Nevertheless, we hope this article helps you find the best solar panels for your home and budget when it comes time to make a move to solar.
4.3
No payments needed for 18 months
Provides in-house financing
Offers top brands like LG and Trina
3.9
Highly rated customer service
Provides 24/7 panel monitoring
Solid A+ rating with the BBB
3.7
Affordable prices
Excellent selection of panels and services
Locations in 22 states
What Are the Common Solar Panel Sizes?
November 13, 2024
Solar Shingles: The Complete Guide for Homeowners
October 29, 2024
The Best Solar Rain Barrel Pumps
November 14, 2024
What Are the Key Principles of Passive Solar Homes?
October 31, 2024
The Best 100-Watt Solar Panels
October 30, 2024
November 13, 2024
Advertiser Disclosure
Our editorial team is committed to creating independent and objective content focused on helping our readers make informed decisions. To help support these efforts we receive compensation from companies that advertise with us.
The compensation we receive from these companies may impact how and where products appear on this site. This compensation does not influence the recommendations or advice our editorial team provides within our content. We do not include all companies, products or offers that may be available.